PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S. V-CON INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD (Supreme Court)
(i) This case does not involve a failure by the assessing officer to conduct an investigation. Instead, according to the Revenue, it is a case...
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...
Shrinivasa Realcon Private Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Anti Evasion Branch, CGST (Bombay High Court) (Nagpur Bench)
GST is not applicable to the transfer of development rights (TDR) or Floor Space Index (FSI) as part of a development agreement (i) Entry 5B...
The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution VERSUS B. Gunashekar (Supreme Court)
Directions regarding reporting and probe of cash transactions in excess of ₹2 Lakh Section 269ST of the Income Tax Act, was introduced to curb black...
Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 483
Framework for distinguishing between works protected under the Copyright Act, 1957, and designs eligible for protection under the Designs Act, 2000 (i) The expression ‘artistic...
ASHISH KAKKAR VERSUS UT OF CHANDIGARH (Supreme Court)
The arrest memo cannot be construed as grounds of arrest, as no other worthwhile particulars have been furnished. This, being a clear non-compliance of the...