The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution VERSUS B. Gunashekar (Supreme Court)
Directions regarding reporting and probe of cash transactions in excess of ₹2 Lakh Section 269ST of the Income Tax Act, was introduced to curb black...
Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 483
Framework for distinguishing between works protected under the Copyright Act, 1957, and designs eligible for protection under the Designs Act, 2000 (i) The expression ‘artistic...
RAJU NAIDU VERSUS CHENMOUGA SUNDRA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 368
(i) Protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 for a person possessing a property under part performance of a contract, is...
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMA vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (SUPREME COURT)
(i) It is well established that offences under the PMLA are of a continuing nature, and the act of money laundering does not conclude with...
HARSHIT HARISH JAIN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 104
(i) Even if one were to hold that the Appellants’ claim is examined under the amended six-month period, we are of the considered opinion that...
Rakesh Brijlal Jain and Ors. Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors (Bombay High Court) 2025:BHC-AS:2680
(i) A mere breach of promise, agreement or contract does not,ipsofacto, constitute an offence of criminal breach of trust without there being a clear case...
U. SUDHEERA VERSUS C. YASHODA (Supreme Court)
(i) The High Court, without formulating substantial questions of law, cannot grant any interim relief by directing the parties to maintain status quo, till the...
URMILA DIXIT Versus SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT (Supreme Court)
The preamble of the the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 states that it is intended towards more effective provisions...
DWARIKA PRASAD (D) THR. LRs. VERSUS PRITHVI RAJ SINGH (Supreme Court)
It is well settled that Courts should not shut out cases on mere technicalities but rather afford opportunity to both sides and thrash out the...
Gofelal Banjare v. Bhagelal Banjare (Dead) AIR 2024 Chhattisgarh 185 (HC)
In the facts are that the Trail court had repeatedly granted adjournments for plaintiff to present witness , but on final date , original lawyer...