Uncategorized

CBDT clarifies provisions under Finance Act 2023 relating to donations made by a trust / institution to another trust / institution for purposes of application of income

MASTI

CBDT clarifies provisions under Finance Act 2023 relating to donations made by a trust / institution to another trust / institution for purposes of application of income


Any trust or institution registered u/s 12AA or 12AB of the Income Tax Act 1961 is exempt, subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions

Posted On: 06 MAR 2024 4:50PM by PIB Delhi

Income of any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in specified sub-clauses of section 10 (23C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or any trust or institution registered under section 12AA/12AB of the Act is exempt, subject to fulfilment of certain conditions specified under various sections of the Act.

Finance Act, 2023 provided that donations made by a trust / institution (other than towards corpus) shall be treated as application for charitable or religious purposes only to the extent of 85% of such donations.

Representations have been received by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) raising concerns as to whether the balance 15% of donation to other trust / institution would be taxable or would be eligible for 15% accumulation, since the funds would not be available, having been already disbursed.

CBDT has examined the matter with reference to the issues raised above. Vide Circular No. 3/2024 in F.No.370142/5/2024-TPL dated 06.03.2024, issued today, the matter has been clarified by illustrative examples, for lucid understanding. The said Circular is available on circular-3-2024.pdf (incometaxindia.gov.in).

CBDT Circular No. 3/2024 dated 06.03.2024

MASTI

CBDT clarifies provisions relating to donations made by a trust / institution to another trust / institution for the purposes of application of income. Circular No. 3/2024 dated 06.03.2024 issued, providing clarity on the issue with illustrative examples. The Circular is available on :https://incometaxindia.gov.in/communications/circular/circular-3-2024.pdf

CBDT Circular No. 2/2024 dated 05.03.2024

MASTI

Income of certain trusts/institutions as specified u/s 10(23C) or u/s 12AA/12AB of the Income – tax Act, 1961 is exempt, subject to certain conditions. Such entities are required to get their accounts audited & furnish the audit report in Form 10B/10BB before the specified date. Since, incorrect audit reports were furnished in numerous cases which could result in denial of exemption & subsequent creation of tax demand, CBDT allows such trusts / institutions to furnish the audit report in the applicable Form No. 10B / 10BB on or before 31st March, 2024. CBDT Circular No. 2/2024 dated 05.03.2024 issued.

CBDT allows certain trusts / institutions to furnish the audit report in the applicable Form No. 10B / 10BB on or before 31st March, 2024

MASTI

CBDT allows certain trusts / institutions to furnish the audit report in the applicable Form No. 10B / 10BB on or before 31st March, 2024

Posted On: 05 MAR 2024 7:20PM by PIB Delhi

Income of any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in specified sub-clauses of section 10 (23C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or any trust or institution registered under section 12AA/12AB of the Act is exempt, subject to fulfilment of certain conditions specified under various sections of the Act.

One of the conditions required to be fulfilled by the trust or institution in order to be eligible to claim exemption, is, that it is required to get its accounts audited and furnish the audit report in the prescribed Form No. 10B / 10BB before the specified date.

It has come to the attention of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) that in a number of cases trusts / institutions have furnished audit report in Form No. 10B, where Form No. 10BB was required to be furnished for the A.Y. 2023-24. Similarly, in a number of cases trusts / institutions have furnished audit report in Form No. 10BB, where Form No. 10B was required to be furnished for the A.Y. 2023-24.

It is stated that, non-furnishing of audit report in the prescribed form would result in denial of exemption in such cases, as it is one of the conditions which is required to be satisfied for claim of exemption. The denial of exemption on this account may result in creation of tax demand.

In view of the above, the CBDT has allowed those trusts / institutions which have furnished audit report on or before 31st October, 2023 in Form No. 10B where Form No. 10BB was applicable and vice-versa, to furnish the audit report in the applicable Form No. 10B / 10BB for the A.Y. 2023-24, on or before 31st March, 2024.

CBDT Circular No. 2/2024 in F.No.370142/6/2024-TPL dated 05.03.2024 has been issued. The said Circular is available on www.incometaxindia.gov.in.

Implementation of e-Verification Scheme-2021

MASTI

Income Tax Department has identified certain mismatches between third party information on interest and dividend income, and the Income Tax Return (ITR) filed by taxpayers

Taxpayers can provide response on-screen functionality on Compliance portal of the e-filing website https://eportal.incometax.gov.in to reconcile mismatch

Taxpayers are being informed of mismatch through SMS and emails as per details available with Income Tax Department

Posted On: 26 FEB 2024 7:36PM by PIB Delhi

The Income Tax Department has identified certain mismatches between the information received from third parties on interest and dividend income, and the Income Tax Return (ITR) filed by taxpayers. In many cases, taxpayers have not even filed their ITR.

In order to reconcile the mismatch, an on-screen functionality has been made available in the Compliance portal of the e-filing website  https://eportal.incometax.gov.in  for taxpayers to provide their response. At present, the information mismatches relating to Financial Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 have been displayed on the Compliance portal. The taxpayers are also being made aware of the mismatch through SMS and emails as per details available with the Department.

Those taxpayers who have already registered on the e-filing website, can navigate to Compliance portal directly after logging into their account. Details of mismatches identified will be available under the ‘e-Verification’ tab.

Taxpayers who are not registered on the e-filing website have to register themselves on the e-filing website to view the mismatch. For registration, the “Register” button on the e-filing website can be clicked and the relevant details can be provided therein. After successful registration, the e-filing account can be logged into and the Compliance portal can be navigated to view the mismatches.

The on-screen functionality is self-contained and will allow the taxpayers to reconcile the mismatch on the portal itself by furnishing their response.  No document is required to be furnished. This is a pro-active step taken by the Department to reach out to the taxpayers and provide them an opportunity to respond to the communication in a structured manner. It is clarified that the said communication is not a notice.

In case the taxpayer has disclosed the interest income in the ITR under the line item ‘Others’ in the Schedule OS, s/he need not respond to the mismatch pertaining to the interest income. The said mismatch shall be resolved on its own and will be reflected in the portal as ‘Completed’.

The taxpayers who are unable to explain the mismatch may consider the option of furnishing an Updated Income Tax Return if eligible, to make good any under reporting of income.

MCA operationalises Central Processing Centre (CPC) for Centralised Processing of Corporate Filings

MASTI

12 forms/applications will be processed at CPC from 16.02.2024; followed by other forms from 01.04.2024 onward

CPC will process applications in time-bound and faceless manner on the lines of Central Registration Centre (CRC) and Centralised Processing for Accelerated Corporate Exit (C-PACE)

Due to consistent efforts taken by MCA towards Ease of Doing Business, Incorporation of LLPs and companies is highest as compared to any of the previous financial years as on 14.02.2024

Posted On: 16 FEB 2024 2:15PM by PIB Delhi

On the lines of continuous endeavor to provide Ease of Doing Business in pursuance to Union Budget Announcement 2023-24, Central Processing Centre (CPC) has been established to process forms filed as part of various regulatory requirements under Companies Act and Limited Liability Partnership Act (LLP Act) in a centralised manner, requiring no physical interaction with the stakeholders.

From 16.02.2024, 12 forms/applications as listed below shall be processed at CPC, followed by other forms from 01.04.2024 onward. Later, forms/applications filed under LLP Act are also proposed to be centralised. Based on filing trends, it is expected that about 2.50 lakh forms will be processed through CPC annually, once it is fully operational.

 

Name of Form Description
MGT-14  Filing of Resolutions and Agreements
SH-7  Alteration in Capital
INC-24   Change in Name
INC-6  Conversion of One Person Company to Private or Public, or Private to OPC
INC-27   Conversion from Private into Public or Vice Versa
INC-20   Revocation/surrender of licence under Section 8 of the Act
DPT-3   Return of Deposits
MSC- 1  Application for obtaining the status of dormant company
MSC- 4   Application for seeking status of Active Company
SH-8   Letter of offer for Buy-Back
SH-9  Declaration of Solvency
SH-11   Return in respect of buy-back of securities

 

As of now, 4,910 forms have been received by CPC after commencing operations. The forms shall be processing a timebound and faceless manner. Processing of applications at CRC and C-PACE also does not require any physical interaction with the stakeholders.

The Central Registration Centre (CRC), Centralised Processing for Accelerated Corporate Exit (C-PACE), and CPC will ensure speedy processing of applications and forms filed for incorporation, closure and for meeting regulatory requirements so that the companies are incorporated, closed, can alter and raise capital, and are able to complete their various compliances under the corporate laws with ease.

After the establishment of CPC, jurisdictional Registrar of Companies (RoC), will have to focus more on their core functions of inquiries, inspection and investigation for ensuring robust corporate governance.

Further Steps towards Ease of Doing Business

Over the past many years, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has taken several steps towards Ease of Doing Business.

An important part of the EoDB has been initiatives taken towards ease of entry in terms of quicker incorporation of companies. Central Registration Centre (CRC) was established for centralised, expeditious, transparent processing of applications filed for companies and LLPs for incorporation in Non-STP (Straight Through Processing) mode. This has yielded desired results. While during FY 2013-14, 1,02,063 Companies and LLPs were incorporated, during FY 2022-23, 1,95,586 Companies and LLPs got incorporated, registering an increase of about 92%.

 

 

Incorporation of LLPs and companies till 14.02.2024 this financial year has been not only more than the previous Financial Year 2022-23, but also the highest as compared to any of the previous financial years.

Following ease of entry, it was announced in the Union Budget Speech 2022-23 to establish Centralised Processing for Accelerated Corporate Exit (C-PACE) for expeditious voluntary closure of companies under the provisions of Section 248(2) of Companies Act, 2013 from more than 2 years to less than 6 months. Accordingly, C-PACE was established and operationalised on 01.05.2023. Under C-PACE, applications filed for voluntary closure of companies are getting processed in Non-STP within an average time of less than 4 months (about 100 days) compared to an average time of more than 18 months earlier. C-PACE has processed and closed 12,441 companies so far. Only 3,368 applications are pending with C-PACE, the lowest as compared to any previous year.

Law Commission of India submits its Report titled “Law on Matrimonial Issues Relating to Non-Resident Indians and Overseas Citizens of India”

MASTI

22nd Law Commission of India has submitted its Report No. 287 titled “Law on Matrimonial Issues Relating to Non-Resident Indians and Overseas Citizens of India” to the Government of India on 15.02.2024.

The Law Commission of India received a reference on The Registration of Marriage of Non-Resident Indians Bill, 2019 (NRI Bill, 2019) from the Ministry of External Affairs, received through the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, for examination.

Having conducted an in-depth study of the law concerning the instant subject-matter, including the NRI Bill, 2019 , the Commission is of the considered opinion that the proposed central legislation should be comprehensive enough to cater to all facets involving marriages of NRIs as well as foreign citizens of Indian origin with that of Indian citizens. Such a legislation should be made applicable not only to the NRIs but also to those individuals who come within the definition of ‘Overseas Citizens of India’ (OCIs) as laid down under Section 7A of the Citizenship Act, 1955. It is further recommended that all marriages between the NRIs/OCIs and Indian citizens should be made compulsorily registered in India. The said comprehensive central legislation should also include provisions on divorce, maintenance of spouse, custody and maintenance of children, serving of summons, warrants, or judicial documents on the NRIs/OCIs, etc. Further, it is recommended that requisite amendments need to be introduced in the Passports Act, 1967 in order to mandate the declaration of marital status, the linking of a spouse’s passport with the other and mentioning of the Marriage Registration Number on the passports of both the spouses. Furthermore, the Government, in collaboration with the National Commission for Women and the State Commissions for Women in India and the NGOs and Indian associations abroad, should conduct awareness programs for women and their families who are about to enter into marital relationship with NRIs/OCIs.

Promotion of Hindi in Higher Courts

MASTI

Promotion of Hindi in Higher Courts

AI Assisted Legal Translation Advisory Committee assisting translation of e-SCR Judgments into vernacular languages by using AI Tool

31,184 judgments of Supreme Court translated into 16 languages

4,983 judgments of High Courts translated into vernacular language

Posted On: 02 FEB 2024 3:57PM by PIB Delhi

As far as Supreme Court and High Courts are concerned, Article 348(1)(a) of the Constitution of India states that all proceedings in these Courts shall be in English language. However, Article 348 (2) of the Constitution of India provides that the Governor of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorize the use of Hindi Language, or any other language used for any official purposes of the State, in proceedings in the High Court having its principal seat in that State. Further, Section 7 of the Official Language Act, 1963 states that the Governor of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorize the use of Hindi or the official language of the State, in addition to the English Language, for the purposes of any judgment, decree or order passed or made by the High Court for that State and where any judgment, decree or order is passed or made in any such language (other than the English Language), it shall be accompanied by a translation of the same in the English Language issued under the authority of the High Court.

The Cabinet Committee’s decision dated 21.05.1965 has stipulated that consent of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India be obtained on any proposal relating to use of a language other than English in the High Court.

The use of Hindi in the proceedings of High Court of Rajasthan was authorized under Article 348(2) of the Constitution in 1950. After the Cabinet Committee’s decision dated 21.05.1965 as mentioned above, the use of Hindi was authorized in the High Courts of Uttar Pradesh (1969), Madhya Pradesh (1971) and Bihar (1972) in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.

As informed by the Supreme Court of India, Hon’ble Chief Justice of India has constituted the AI Assisted Legal Translation Advisory Committee, headed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka, Judge, Supreme Court of India, for translation of e-SCR Judgments into vernacular languages by using AI Tool. As on 02.12.2023, by using AI translation tools, 31,184 judgments of Supreme Court, have been translated into 16 languages viz. Hindi (21,908), Punjabi (3,574), Kannada (1,898), Tamil (1,172), Gujarati (1,110), Marathi (765), Telugu (334), Malayalam (239), Odia (104), Bengali (39), Nepali (27), Urdu (06), Assamese (05), Garo (01), Khasi (01), Konkani (01). The details of the judgments of Supreme Court translated into 16 languages, as on 02.12.2023, is available on the e-SCR Portal of the Supreme Court website.

A similar Committee has been constituted in all the High Courts, headed by the Judges of the respective High Courts. As of now, the Supreme Court is collaborating with the High Courts in translation of e-SCR Judgments into 16 vernacular languages. As per the information received from the High Courts, 4,983 judgments have been translated into vernacular language and uploaded by the High Courts on their respective websites.

This information was given by the MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE; MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS; MINISTER OF STATE FOR THE MINISTRY OF CULTURE, SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL in a written reply in Lok Sabha today.

High Court Judges appointed as Chief Justices of High Courts

MASTI

Press Communique

Posted On: 02 FEB 2024 11:10PM by PIB Delhi

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint the following Judges of High Courts as Chief Justices of High Courts with effect from the date they assume charges of their respective office in the concerned High Court: –

Sl. No. Name of the Judge (S/Shri Justice) Details
1 Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Acting Chief Justice, Rajasthan High Court (PHC: Chhattisgarh) Appointed as Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court.
2 Kumari Justice Ritu Bahri, Acting Chief Justice, Punjab & Haryana High Court Appointed as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court
3 Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Judge, Patna High Court Appointed as Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court
4 Vijay Bishnoi, Judge, Rajasthan High Court Appointed as Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court.
5 Arun Bhansali, Judge, Rajasthan High Court Appointed as Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court
6 S. Vaidyanathan Judge, Madras High Court Appointed as Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court

******

Housing society can levy charges for cultural activities: Bombay High Court

MASTI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

WRIT PETITION NO. 11870 OF 2019

 

 

Mrs. Jyoti Sharadchandra Lohokare                                .Petitioner

 

V/s.

The Managing Committee, Shreeji Ville CHS Ltd. & Ors.                                                                                                        .Respondents

 

Mr. Butala i/b. M/s. S.S. Butala & Associates, Advocate, for the Petitioner

Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for Respondent No.4 – State

CORAM        :          MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE         :          25.09.2023

 

ORAL JUDGMENT:

 

  1. Heard Mr. Butala, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. Prashant Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1-Housing Society and Mr. Sawant, learned AGP for Respondent 4-State.

 

  1. The Petitioner, by the present Writ Petition fled under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is inter alia challenging the legality and validity of the order dated 6th March 2019 passed by the learned Judge, Co-operative Court, Thane at Thane below Exhibit 5 in Dispute No. CCT 22/2019 as confrmed by the Judgment and Order dated 10th June 2019 passed by the learned Member, Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court, Mumbai in A.O. No. 21 of 2019.

 

  1. By the said Dispute, the Petitioner has challenged a Resolution passed   in   Annual   General   Meeting   dated 11th November 2006 of the Respondent No. 1-Housing Society in respect of levying certain mandatory charges towards expenses for ‘cultural activities’.

 

  1. It is the contention of Mr. Butala, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner that Bye-Law No.148 of the Model Bye-Laws of The Co-operative Housing Society (hereinafter referred to as “said Bye-Laws”) provides for appropriation of profts and as per Bye-law 148(b)(iii) the proft is to be allocated to a ‘Common Welfare Fund’ for furtherance of the objects specifed in Bye-law No.5(d). He further submitted that Bye-law No. 65 provides for compulsory charges to be collected from the members and break-up of said charges of the society are provided in Bye-law No. 66. He submitted that the charges levyed towards expenses for cultural activities are not included under Bye-Law 65 i.e. compulsory charges and therefore said ‘cultural charges’ are illegally levied by Respondent No.1- Society. He therefore submitted that the impugned orders are liable to be quashed and set aside.

 

  1. On the other hand, Mr. Prashant Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent 1–Housing Society submitted that the Society has passed a Resolution in the Annual General Meeting dated 11th November 2006 in respect of charges for the purpose of cultural events. He states that the same is permissible as per law and therefore, no interference is warranted in the impugned orders.

 

  1. Thus, the question to be decided in this Writ Petition is whether a Co-operative Housing Society can levy and collect charges towards expenses for ‘cultural activities’ and whether such an act of a Co-operative Housing Society is permissible in

 

  1. For consideration of the above question, it is necessary to set out the various types of ‘Societies’ as contemplated under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as “said Act“). Section 12 of the said Act provides that the Registrar shall classify all societies into one or other of the classes of societies as defned in Section 2 of the said Act. Section 2 of the said Act contemplates following types of Societies:-
  • Agricultural Marketing Society [(Section 2(1)]

 

Section  2(1):- “agricultural   marketing society” means a society –

 

(a)     the object of which is the marketing of agricultural produce and the supply of implements and other requisites for agricultural production, and

 

  • not less than three-fourths of the members of which are agriculturists, or societies formed by agriculturists;

 

  • Co-operative Bank [Section 2(6), 2(10)]

 

Section 2(6):- “Central Bank” means a co-operative bank, the objects of which include the creation of funds to be loaned to other societies; but does not include the primary urban co-operative bank;

 

Section 2(10):- “Co-operative bank” means a society which is doing the business of banking as defned in clause (b) of sub- sections (1) of section 5 of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 and includes any society which is functioning or is to function a Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank under Chapter XI;

 

Section 2(10) (aii-l):- “co-operative credit structure     entity”     means     the     primaragricultural credit co-operative society, the District Central Co-operative Bank or the State co-operative Bank;

 

  • Consumer Society [(Section 2(9)]

Section 2(9):- “Consumer society” means a society, the object of which is –

 

  • the procurementproduction or processing, and distribution of goods to or the performance of other services, for, its members as also other customers, and

 

(b)     the distribution among its members and customers, in the proportion, prescribed by rules or by bye-laws of the society, of the profts accruing from such procurement, production or processing and distribution;”

 

  • Crop Protection Society [(Section 2 (10-A)]

 

Section 2(10-A):- “Crop Protection Society” means a society, the object of which is protection of the crops, structures, machinery, agricultural implements  and other equipment such as those used for pumping water on the land.

 

  • Farming Society [Section 2(12)]

 

Section  2(12):  farming  society”  means  a society in which, with the  object  of increasing agricultural  production, employment and income and the better utilization of resources; lands are brought together and jointly cultivated by all the members, such lands (a) being owned by or leased to the members (or some of them) or

(b)      coming in possession of the society in any other manner whatsoever;

 

  • Housing Society [Section 2(16)]

 

Section 2(16):- “housing society” means a society, the object of which is to provide its members with open plots for housing, dwelling houses or fats; or if open plots, the dwelling houses or fats are already acquired, to provide its members common amenities and services;

 

 

 

  • Lift Irrigation Society [Section 2(16-A)]

 

Section 2(16-A):- “lift irrigation  society” means a society, the object of which is to provide water supply by motive power or otherwise to its members, for irrigation and otherwise;

 

  • Processing Society [Section 2(22)]

 

Section  2(22):-   “processing  society”  means a society, the object of which is the processing of goods;

 

  • Producers’ Society [Section 2(23)]

 

Section 2(23):- “producers’ society” means a society, the object of which is, the production and disposal of goods or the collective disposal of the labour of the members thereof;

 

  • Resource Society [Section 2(25)]

 

Section 2(25):- “resource society” means a society, the object of which is the obtaining for its members of credit, goods or services required by them.

 

  • General Society [Section 2(15)]

 

Section 2(15):- “general society” means a society not falling in any of the classes of societies defned by the other clauses of this section.”

 

(Emphasis added)

 

 

  1. For considering the question raised in the present Writ Petition, it is also necessary to set out defnition of Society as provided by Section 2(27) of the said Act, which reads as under :-

 

“2(27) “society” means a co-operative society registered, or deemed to be registered, under this Act which is an autonomous association of persons, united voluntarily to meet their common  needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically  controlled  enterprise and adhering to the co-operative principles and values

 

(Emphasis added)

 

The Society, inter alia, means an autonomous association of persons formed to meet their common needs and aspirations through a democratically controlled enterprise, adhering to the co-operative principles and values. Thus, any Society is formed to meet common needs and aspirations of its Members.

 

  1. The Supreme Court, in the decision of Bengal Secretariat Land Mortgage Bank & Housing Society Ltd. v. Aloke Kumar [Civil Appeal 7261 of 2022] reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1404 while examining the constitutional validity of the 97th amendment of the Constitution of India has discussed the nature of Co-operative Society. The relevant part of the said decision is set out herein below :-

“57. By now it is well established position that once a person becomes a member of the Co-operative Society, he loses his individuality with  the Society  and he has no independent rights  except  those  given to him by the statute and bye-laws. The member has to  speak through  the Society or rather the Society alone can act and speaks for him qua the rights and duties of the Society as a body (see : Daman Singh v. State of Punjab, reported in (1985) 2 SCC 670 : AIR 1985 SC 973). This view has been followed in the subsequent decision of this Court in the case of State of U.P v. Chheoki Employees Co-operative Society Ltd., reported in (1997) 3 SCC 681 : AIR 1997 SC 1413. In this decision, this Court further observed that the member of a Society has no independent right qua the Society and it is the Society that is entitled to represent as the corporate  aggregate. This Court also observed that the stream cannot rise higher than the source. Suffce it to observe that so long as the Resolutions passed by the General Body of the Appellant Society are in force and not overturned by a forum of competent jurisdiction, the said decisions would bind the Respondent No. 1. He cannot be permitted to take a stand alone position but is bound by the majority decision of the General Body. Notably, the Respondent No.1 has not challenged the Resolutions passed by the General Body of the Appellant Society to redevelop the property and more so, to appoint the Hi- Rise as the Developer to give him all the redevelopment rights.

  1. 58. …

 

  1. The object of the provision has to be borne in mind. The entire legislative scheme goes to show that the Co- operative Society is to function democratically and the internal democracy of a society, including resolutions passed in accordance with the Act, the Rules, and the bye-laws have to be respected and implemented. The Cooperative Movement is both a theory of life and a system of business. It is a form of voluntary association where individuals unite for mutual aid in the production and  distribution  of  wealth upon principles of equity, reason and common good. It stands for distributive justice and asserts the principle of equality and equity ensuring to all those engaged in the production of wealth a share proportionately commensurate with the degree of their contribution. It provides as a substitute for material assets, honesty and a sense of moral obligation and keeps in view the moral rather than the material sanction. The movement is thus a great Co-operative movement.

 

  1. The basic principles of co-operation are that the members join as human beings and not as capitalists. The Co-operative Society is a form of organization wherein persons associate together  as  human beings on the basis of equality for promotion of economic interest of its This movement is a method of doing the business or other activities with ethical base. “Each for all and all for each” is the motto of the co-operative movement. This movement not only develops latent business capacities of its members but produces leaders; encourages economic and social virtues, honesty and loyalty, becomes imperative, prospects of better life, obtainable by concerted effort  is opened up; the individual realises that there is something more to be sought than mere material gains for himself. So, in fact, it being a business cum moral movement, and the success of the Co-operative Society depends upon the reality with which one of the members work for the achievement of its objects and purpose. The Committee on Co-operation in India emphasized the moral aspect co-operation, to quote the words:— “The theory of co-operation is very briefy that an isolated and powerless individual can, by association, with others and by moral development support, obtain in his own degree the material advantages available to wealthy or powerful persons and thereby develop himself to the fullest extent of his natural abilities. By the Union of forces, material advancement is secured and by united action self reliance is fostered and it from the inter-action of these infuences that it is hoped to attain the effective realisation of the higher and more prosperous standard of life which has been characterised as better business, better arming and better living; we have found that there is a tendency not only among the outside public but also among supporters of the movement to be little its moral aspect and to regard this as superfuous idealism. Cooperation in actual practice must often fall short of the standard aimed at and details inconsistent with co-operative ideals have often to be accepted in the hope that they may lead to better things. We wish clearly to express that it is the true co-operation alone, that is, to a co-operation which recognises the moral accept of the question that Government must look for the amelioration of the masses and not to a psudo co-operative edifce, however imposing, which is built in ignorance of co- operative principles. The movement is essentially a moral one and it is individualistic rather than socialistic. It provides as a substitute for material assets honesty and a sense of moral obligation and keeps in view the moral rather than the material sanction. Pages 5 and 6 of Theory and Practice of Co-operation in India and Abroad by Kulkarni, Volume 1. Co-operation is a mode of doing business, is at present applied as the solution of many economic problems. Co-operation is harnessed to almost all forms of economic activity. Though co-operation was introduced in this country as a remedy for rural indebtedness, it has been applied successfully in a wide range of activities such as production, distribution, banking, supply, marketing, housing and insuranceSee Theory and Practice of Co-operation in India and Abroad by Kulkarni Volume 1 Page 2.”

 

(Emphasis added)

 

 

Thus, it is settled legal position that the Co-operative Society is to function democratically and the internal democracy of a society, including resolutions passed in accordance with the Act, the Rules, and the bye-laws have to be respected and implemented. The above observations of the Supreme Court are squarely applicable to the Societies registered under the provisions of the said Act.

 

  1. At this stage, only it is required to be noted that out of 100 members of the Respondent No. 1 – Society, only 1 member e. Petitioner has challenged Resolution  passed  by the Respondent No. 1 – Society by majority to create ‘cultural funds’

 

  1. A perusal of the objects of various Societies as contemplated under the said Act clearly shows that there is a distinction between ‘Housing Societies’ and ‘other Societies’. As far as Societies concerning agricultural operations viz. Agricultural Marketing Society, Crop Protection Society, Farming Society, Lift Irrigation Society are concerned, the object inter alia is enhancement of income of the agriculturists. The object of Consumer Society inter alia is distribution of goods to the members. The objects of Co- operative Bank/Credit Co-operative Society are banking and related activities. Thus, the basic objects of all these Societies are related to augmentation of income of its member or providing credit and banking activities. Thus, in a way all such other Societies are concerned with commercial aspects and fnancial gain/support with respect to their Members.

 

  1. However, it is required to be noted that the nature of a ‘Co-operative Housing Society’ is entirely different from that of other Societies as contemplated under the provisions of the said Sub-Section 16 of Section 2 defnes ‘housing society’ as a society, the object of which is to provide its Members with open plots for housing, dwelling houses or fats; or if open plots, the dwelling houses or fats are already acquired, to provide its Members common amenities and services. The housing societies are societies where, in these fats,  Society  Members  along  with their family members reside. Therefore, Model Bye-laws of Co-operative Housing Society inter alia provides in its objects in Bye-Law No.5 as follows :-

“(b) To manage, maintain and administer the property of the Society;

 

(c)              To raise funds for achieving the objects of the Society;

 

  • To undertake and provide for, on its own account or jointly with a co-operative or other institution for social, cultural or recreative activities;

 

(e)              To provide Co-operative Education and Training to develop Co-operative skills to …………………. its ………………………..

Members, Committee Members, Offcers and employees of Society.

 

(f)               To do all things, necessary or expedient for the attainment of the objects of the Society, specifed in these Bye- Laws.”

 

(Emphasis added)

 

It is undisputed that the said Model Bye-laws have been adopted by Respondent No.1-Housing Society. Thus, one of the objects of the housing society is to undertake social, ‘cultural’ or recreational activities. The Bye-Law No.5(f) provides that to do all things, necessary or expedient for the attainment of the objects of the Society, specifed in these Bye-Laws is an object of the Society.

 

 

The Bye-Law No. 5(c) provides that to raise funds for achieving the objects of the Society is also one of the objects of the Society. Thus, to raise funds to undertake Social, Cultural or recreational activities itself is one of the objects of the Housing Society.

 

  1. It is to be noted that such type of activities are required as Society Members along with their family members reside in such housing socieities. It is also important to note that the defnition of “society” under Section 2(27) of the said Act specifes the same as an autonomous association of persons, united voluntarily to meet their common needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise and adhering to the co-operative principles and values. It is well established that human being is a social Hence, it is important for the housing Societies to organise and conduct Social, Cultural or Rerecreational activities.

 

  1. It is necessary  to  consider  the  submissions  of  Butala, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in the above background. Mr. Butala has relied on Bye-law Nos.65 and 66. Apart from these two Bye-laws, Bye-law No.67 is also important. All these three Bye-laws are set out herein below for ready reference.

 

65.   Composition of the Charges of the Society The    contribution    to    be    collected     from            the Members of the Society, towards outgoings and establishment of its funds, referred to in these Bye-laws as the ‘charges’ may be in relation to the following:

 

(a) Property Taxes, (b) Water Charges, (c) Common Electricity Charges, (d) Contribution to Repairs and Maintenance Fund, (e) Expenses on repairs and maintenance of the lifts of the Society, including charges for running the lift. (f) Contribution to the sinking fund, (g) Service Charges, (h) Car Parking Charges, (i) Interest on the defaulted charges,

(j) Repayment of the instalment of the loan and interest, (k) Non-occupancy charges, (l) Insurance Charges, (m) Lease rent, (n) Non- agricultural tax, (o) Education and Training Fund (p) Election Fund (q) Any Other Charges.

 

  1. Break-up of Service Charges of the Society The Service charges of the Society referred to at 65 (g) above shall include the following:

 

(a)           Salaries of the offce staff, liftmen, watchmen, malis and any other employees of the Society.

 

  • Where the Society has independent Offce, the property taxes, electricity charges, water charges

 

(c)     Printing, Stationery and Postage,

 

  • Travelling allowance and conveyance charges to the staff and the Members of the Committee of the

 

 

 

(e)        Sitting fees paid to the Members of the Committee of the Society,

 

  • Subscription to the Education Fund of the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh

 

(g)           Annual Subscription of the Housing Federation and any other co-operative institution to which the Society is affliated.

 

  • Entrance fees for affliation to the Housing Federation and any other co-operative

 

(i)         Audit Fees for Internal, Statutory and Reaudit, if any.

 

  • Expenses incurred at meetings of the General Body, the Committee and the Sub- Committee, if

 

(k)           Retainer fees, legal charges, statutory enquiry fees.

 

  • Common electricity

 

(m)       Any other charges approved by the General Body at its Meeting. However such charges should not contradict the provisions of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws of the Society.

 

  1. Sharing of  the  Society’s  charges  by  the Members

 

  • The Committee  shall  apportion  the  Share of each Member towards the charges of the Society on the following basis:

 

 

(i) Property taxes : As fxed by the Local Authority.
(ii) Water Charges : On the basis of total number and size of inlets provided in each fat.
(iii) Expenses on repairs and maintenance of the building/buildings of the Society : At the rate fxed at the general body from time  to  time,  subject  to  the  minimum  of

0.75       per      cent       per      annum,       of     the construction cost of each fat for meeting

expenses of normal recurring repairs.

(iv) Expenses on repairs and maintenance of the lift, including charges for running the lift : Equally by all the Members of the building in which lift is provided, irrespective of the fact whether they use the lift or not.
(v) Sinking Fund : As provided under the bye-law No. 13(c).
(vi) Service Charges : Equally divided by number of fats.
(vii) Parking Charges : At the rate fxed by the General Body of the Society at its meeting under the Bye-law No. 83/84.
(viii) Interest on the delayed payment of Charges : : At the rate fxed under the Bye-law No. 71 to be recovered from the defaulter Member.
(ix) Repayment installment and interest  

of

of the the loan : The amount of each instalment interest fxed by the fnancing agency. with
(x) Non-occupancy charges : At the rate fxed under the Byê-law No. 43(c).
(xi) Insurance Charges : The built up areas of each fat, provided that if there is increase in the insurance premium due to storing any specifc goods in any fat, used for commercial purposes, the extra burden of insurance premium shall be shared by those who are responsible for such increased premium in proportion of the built-up areas to their fats.
(xii) Lease Rent : The built-up area of each fat.
(xiii) Non-Agricultural tax : The built-up area of each fat.
(xiv) Education       &      Training Fund : Rs. 10 per Flat/unit per month.
(xv) Election Fund : Equally by the members and as prescribed by the election authority in the Rules made thereof and as decided by the General Body Meeting of the Society.
(xvi) Any other charges : As may be decided by the General Body Meeting of the Society

 

 

Committee to fx Society’s Charges in respect of every flat

 

(b)     The Committee shall fx in respect of every flat the Society Charges on the basis laid down as under the Bye-law No. 66 (a).”

 

(Emphasis added)

 

 

  1. It is clear that Bye-law 65 provides that the contribution can be collected from the Members for the day to day funtioning of the Society and establishment of its funds. The charges which can be collected from the members inter alia includes ‘any other charges’. Bye-law No.66(m) provides that ‘any other charges’ should be approved by the General Body at its meeting. It further provides that such charges should not contradict the provisions of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws of the Society. Bye-law No.67 is regarding sharing of the Society’s Charges by the Members and provides that as far as ‘any other charges’ are concerned, the same may be decided by the General Body of the Society.

 

  1. Thus, it is very clear that the Model Bye-laws provide for collection of charges from the members as provided in Bye-law 65. Bye-law No.65(q) provides that ‘any other charges’ can be collected from the members of the Society. Bye-law No.66(m) provides that such ‘any other charges’ should be approved by the General Body of the Society and such charges should not contradict the provisions of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws of the Society. Bye-law No.5(d) specifcally provides that the object of a Co-operative Housing Society inter alia is to undertake and provide for, on its own account or jointly with a co-operative or other institution for ‘social, cultural or re-creative activities’.

 

  1. As per Resolution dated 11th November 2006 passed by the General Body of the Respondent No.1Housing Society, a resolution has been passed inter alia to set up a cultural fund and an amount of Rs.70/- per fat per month towards the said cultural fund was approved to be collected from the Members for undertaking various cultural activites/events and annual gathering and further that this amount would be included in monthly Bye-law No.67(a)(xvi) provides that the Committee shall apportion the share of each Member with respect to any other charges as may be decided by the General Body of the housing Society.

 

 

  1. It is one of the contentions of Butalathat Bye-law No.148(b)(iii) provides for allocation to a Common Welfare Fund, such part of the proft as the General Body may determine to be utilised in furtherance of the objects specifed in the Bye-law No.5(d). Therefore, it is his submission that such an amount can be utilised only if the housing Society earns a proft. However, if the objects of the housing Society are seen, then it is not a proft making body, but the charges are levied for the purpose of collecting funds for the objects of the society and one of the objects of the society is to undertake social, ‘cultural’ or re-creative activities. Bye-law No.148 cannot be interpreted in such a manner that there is a restriction on the Society to set up a cultural fund and collect the contribution for such a fund and that such a fund to be created only from proft earned by Society. The only prohibition for levy and collection of charges is that it should be approved by the General Body and said charges should not contradict the provisions of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws of the society. As Bye-laws of the Respondent No.1-Housing Society specifcally provide for undertaking social, ‘cultural’ or recreational activities, and as the charges towards ‘cultural fund’ are approved by the General Body of the Respondent No.1- Housing Society, the challenge to the impugned order fails.

 

  1. It is unfortunate that out of 100 members of Respondent 1–Housing Society, only 1 member i.e. the Petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the Resolution, by which the Respondent No. 1–Housing Society has decided to set up a ‘cultural fund’ for the purpose of undertaking various cultural activities/events and annual gathering.

 

  1. Therefore, no interference is warranted under the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of Accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed.

 

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)