HARSHIT HARISH JAIN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 104
(i) Even if one were to hold that the Appellants’ claim is examined under the amended six-month period, we are of the considered opinion that...
M/S VIDYAWATI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 101
Under section 16(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, by accepting the appointment of the sole arbitrator and filing its statement of defence, the...
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR VERSUS SMT. PRABHA JAIN & ORS (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 95
(i) Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act provides that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding“in respect of any matter...
Rakesh Brijlal Jain and Ors. Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors (Bombay High Court) 2025:BHC-AS:2680
(i) A mere breach of promise, agreement or contract does not,ipsofacto, constitute an offence of criminal breach of trust without there being a clear case...
U. SUDHEERA VERSUS C. YASHODA (Supreme Court)
(i) The High Court, without formulating substantial questions of law, cannot grant any interim relief by directing the parties to maintain status quo, till the...
RATHEESHKUMAR @ BABU VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA (SUPREME COURT)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2018 (i) The first important question is whether the appellant-convict at the relevant time was having a reasonable apprehension of death...
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – INTERNATIONAL TAXATION versus SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD (Delhi High Court)
Whether secondment of employees constitutes a Fixed Place Permanent Establishment [“PE”] in India within the meaning of Article 5 of the Double Tax Avoidance Treaty...
URMILA DIXIT Versus SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT (Supreme Court)
The preamble of the the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 states that it is intended towards more effective provisions...