Month: September 2025

(i) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the FIR dated 06.02.2022 as well as the final report, we are of...

(i) The Supreme Court framed guidelines for compounding offences under the NI Act nearly fifteen years back in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H.,...

(i) A bare perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by complainant/respondent No.2 are vague and omnibus. Other than claiming that the husband...

(i) When the amount mentioned and demanded in the notice sent under Proviso (b) to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to the...

(i) The assessments undertaken for the three years were already held to be invalid because of being time barred, in view of Section 19 of...

In Kewal Krishnan v. Rajesh Kumar and Others reported in (2022) 18 SCC 489, while looking into whether the defendants had paid any sale consideration...

(i) The length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned...

(i) In Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat, (2025) 4 SCC 818 the Supreme Court held that where the allegations pertain to the abuse...

(i) It is by now well settled that summoning any person on the basis of a frivolous or vexatious complaint is something very serious. This...

A marital dispute arising out of a marriage conducted in India between two Hindus under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act can only be...