J Revathy v The Government of India (Madras High Court)
(i) In the considered view of this Court, the application submitted by the petitioner seeking for passport has to be processed independently. It is not...
SMT ANJALI SHARMA Versus RAMAN UPADHYAY (Madhya Pradesh High Court) (Gwalior Bench) MISC. PETITION No. 3395 of 2023
(i) In order to achieve its object to simplify the rules of evidence and procedure, Section 14 of the Family Courts Act provides for an...
Sandeep S/o Devidas Aware VERSUS State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) (Nagpur Bench)
Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act: (i) It is noticed that...
MAHNOOR FATIMA IMRAN VERSUS M/S VISWESWARA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 646
(i) An instrument of conveyance is compulsorily registrable as required under the Registration Act. Section 23 prescribes four-months’ time for presenting a document for registration...
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) VERSUS ANUPAM GARG (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 808
(i) A reference to GDA v. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 shows that compensation can take different forms, considering the facts and circumstances at...
GHANSHYAM SONI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 803)
(i) A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by the complainant are that in the year 1999, the Appellant inflicted mental and...
Angad Soni vs Arpita Yadav (Allahabad High Court) (2025:AHC-LKO:32543-DB)
(i) The proviso to Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is an exception to the necessity for expiration of a period of...
K. Gopi versus The Sub-Registrar (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 462
(i) The registering officer is not concerned with the title held by the executant. He has no adjudicatory power to decide whether the executant has...
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S. V-CON INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD (Supreme Court)
(i) This case does not involve a failure by the assessing officer to conduct an investigation. Instead, according to the Revenue, it is a case...
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...