Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 483
Framework for distinguishing between works protected under the Copyright Act, 1957, and designs eligible for protection under the Designs Act, 2000 (i) The expression ‘artistic...
ASHISH KAKKAR VERSUS UT OF CHANDIGARH (Supreme Court)
The arrest memo cannot be construed as grounds of arrest, as no other worthwhile particulars have been furnished. This, being a clear non-compliance of the...
IMRAN PRATAPGADHI VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 410
(i) Sub-Section (3) of Section 173 of the BNSS makes a significant departure from Section 154 of CrPC. It provides that when information relating to...
DISORTHO S.A.S. VERSUS MERIL LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 352
(i) There exists a divergence of opinion, both internationally and domestically, on the appropriate test to determine jurisdiction in a case of trans-border arbitration. This...
RAJU NAIDU VERSUS CHENMOUGA SUNDRA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 368
(i) Protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 for a person possessing a property under part performance of a contract, is...
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMA vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (SUPREME COURT)
(i) It is well established that offences under the PMLA are of a continuing nature, and the act of money laundering does not conclude with...
RAMESH MISHRIMAL JAIN VERSUS AVINASH VISHWANATH PATNE (Supreme Court)
(i) The legal position is very clear that the stamp duty is on the instrument and not on the transaction. Furthermore, it is immaterial, whether...
VIHAAN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 162
Sub-Section (1) of Section 41 of CrPC lists cases where police may arrest a person without a warrant. The corresponding provision in the Bharatiya Nagarik...
HARSHIT HARISH JAIN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 104
(i) Even if one were to hold that the Appellants’ claim is examined under the amended six-month period, we are of the considered opinion that...
M/S VIDYAWATI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 101
Under section 16(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, by accepting the appointment of the sole arbitrator and filing its statement of defence, the...