M.V. LEELAVATHI VERSUS DR. C. R. SWAMY (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 994
(i) The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which the High Court upheld. We directed both parties to file affidavits disclosing their income and...
A. RANJITHKUMAR VERSUS E. KAVITHA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 978
(i) It is evident that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. They have been living separately since 2010, for nearly 15 years....
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 909
(i) Section 64 of the BNSS, 2023 pertains to how summons shall be served. We are concerned with Section 64(2) of the BNSS, 2023 which...
M.C. RAVIKUMAR VERSUS D.S. VELMURUGAN (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 888
(i) From the bare perusal of the record, it is evident that the second quashing petition raised no such grounds/pleas which were unavailable to the...
SHIVANGI BANSAL VERSUS SAHIB BANSAL (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 883
The guidelines framed by the High Court of Allahabad in the impugned judgment dated 13.06.2022 in Criminal Revision No. 1126 of 2022 vide paras 32...
PRADEEP BHARDWAJ VERSUS PRIYA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 852
(i) It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court that the institution of marriage is rooted in dignity, mutual respect and shared companionship, and...
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) VERSUS ANUPAM GARG (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 808
(i) A reference to GDA v. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 shows that compensation can take different forms, considering the facts and circumstances at...
GHANSHYAM SONI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 803)
(i) A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by the complainant are that in the year 1999, the Appellant inflicted mental and...
K. Gopi versus The Sub-Registrar (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 462
(i) The registering officer is not concerned with the title held by the executant. He has no adjudicatory power to decide whether the executant has...
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...