DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...
The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution VERSUS B. Gunashekar (Supreme Court)
Directions regarding reporting and probe of cash transactions in excess of ₹2 Lakh Section 269ST of the Income Tax Act, was introduced to curb black...
IMRAN PRATAPGADHI VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 410
(i) Sub-Section (3) of Section 173 of the BNSS makes a significant departure from Section 154 of CrPC. It provides that when information relating to...
DISORTHO S.A.S. VERSUS MERIL LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 352
(i) There exists a divergence of opinion, both internationally and domestically, on the appropriate test to determine jurisdiction in a case of trans-border arbitration. This...
RAMESH MISHRIMAL JAIN VERSUS AVINASH VISHWANATH PATNE (Supreme Court)
(i) The legal position is very clear that the stamp duty is on the instrument and not on the transaction. Furthermore, it is immaterial, whether...
M/S VIDYAWATI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 101
Under section 16(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, by accepting the appointment of the sole arbitrator and filing its statement of defence, the...