Counsel: N. A

(i) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the FIR dated 06.02.2022 as well as the final report, we are of...

(i) A bare perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by complainant/respondent No.2 are vague and omnibus. Other than claiming that the husband...

(i) When the amount mentioned and demanded in the notice sent under Proviso (b) to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to the...

In Kewal Krishnan v. Rajesh Kumar and Others reported in (2022) 18 SCC 489, while looking into whether the defendants had paid any sale consideration...

(i) The law relating to power of a criminal court to review or alter its own judgment or order is governed by the provisions of...

(i) The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which the High Court upheld. We directed both parties to file affidavits disclosing their income and...

(i) It is evident that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. They have been living separately since 2010, for nearly 15 years....

(i) Section 64 of the BNSS, 2023 pertains to how summons shall be served. We are concerned with Section 64(2) of the BNSS, 2023 which...

(i) From the bare perusal of the record, it is evident that the second quashing petition raised no such grounds/pleas which were unavailable to the...

The guidelines framed by the High Court of Allahabad in the impugned judgment dated 13.06.2022 in Criminal Revision No. 1126 of 2022 vide paras 32...