M.C. RAVIKUMAR VERSUS D.S. VELMURUGAN (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 888
(i) From the bare perusal of the record, it is evident that the second quashing petition raised no such grounds/pleas which were unavailable to the...
HYATT INTERNATIONAL SOUTHWEST ASIA LTD VERSUS ADIT (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 891
(i) Evidently, under DTAAs, the taxing rights of the source State over the business profits of a foreign enterprise are contingent upon the existence of...
SHIVANGI BANSAL VERSUS SAHIB BANSAL (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 883
The guidelines framed by the High Court of Allahabad in the impugned judgment dated 13.06.2022 in Criminal Revision No. 1126 of 2022 vide paras 32...
PRADEEP BHARDWAJ VERSUS PRIYA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 852
(i) It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court that the institution of marriage is rooted in dignity, mutual respect and shared companionship, and...
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED VERSUS SHREE NIWAS RAMGOPAL (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 832
(i) It is settled in law by virtue of Section 42 of the Partnership Act, 1932 that the partnership will stand dissolved inter alia on...
MAHNOOR FATIMA IMRAN VERSUS M/S VISWESWARA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 646
(i) An instrument of conveyance is compulsorily registrable as required under the Registration Act. Section 23 prescribes four-months’ time for presenting a document for registration...
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) VERSUS ANUPAM GARG (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 808
(i) A reference to GDA v. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 shows that compensation can take different forms, considering the facts and circumstances at...
GHANSHYAM SONI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 803)
(i) A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by the complainant are that in the year 1999, the Appellant inflicted mental and...
K. Gopi versus The Sub-Registrar (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 462
(i) The registering officer is not concerned with the title held by the executant. He has no adjudicatory power to decide whether the executant has...
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S. V-CON INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD (Supreme Court)
(i) This case does not involve a failure by the assessing officer to conduct an investigation. Instead, according to the Revenue, it is a case...