SHANTI DEVI VERSUS JAGAN DEVI (SUPREME COURT)
In Kewal Krishnan v. Rajesh Kumar and Others reported in (2022) 18 SCC 489, while looking into whether the defendants had paid any sale consideration...
SHIVAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS VERSUS KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD (SUPREME COURT)
(i) The length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned...
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY VERSUS SEESH RAM SAINI (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1095
(i) In Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat, (2025) 4 SCC 818 the Supreme Court held that where the allegations pertain to the abuse...
PRADEEP KUMAR KESARWANI VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Supreme Court)
(i) It is by now well settled that summoning any person on the basis of a frivolous or vexatious complaint is something very serious. This...
VIKRAM BAKSHI AND OTHERS VERSUS R.P. KHOSLA (SUPREME COURT)
(i) The law relating to power of a criminal court to review or alter its own judgment or order is governed by the provisions of...
VIJAY KRISHNASWAMI VERSUS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1048
(i) As per departmental circular dated 24.04.2008, Prosecution Manual, 2009, and CBDT’s circular dated 09.09.2019, prosecution under Section u/s 276C(1) shall be launched only after...
M.V. LEELAVATHI VERSUS DR. C. R. SWAMY (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 994
(i) The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which the High Court upheld. We directed both parties to file affidavits disclosing their income and...
A. RANJITHKUMAR VERSUS E. KAVITHA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 978
(i) It is evident that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. They have been living separately since 2010, for nearly 15 years....
ASHOK DHANKAD versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 974
(1) The grant of bail constitutes a discretionary judicial remedy that necessitates a delicate and context-sensitive balancing of competing legal and societal interests. On one...
IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs ADHUNIK MEGHALAYA STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 911
(i) It cannot be disputed that entries in Balance Sheets could constitute a valid acknowledgement in view of the categorical pronouncement of the Supreme Court...