PRADEEP KUMAR KESARWANI VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Supreme Court)
(i) It is by now well settled that summoning any person on the basis of a frivolous or vexatious complaint is something very serious. This...
VIKRAM BAKSHI AND OTHERS VERSUS R.P. KHOSLA (SUPREME COURT)
(i) The law relating to power of a criminal court to review or alter its own judgment or order is governed by the provisions of...
VIJAY KRISHNASWAMI VERSUS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1048
(i) As per departmental circular dated 24.04.2008, Prosecution Manual, 2009, and CBDT’s circular dated 09.09.2019, prosecution under Section u/s 276C(1) shall be launched only after...
M.V. LEELAVATHI VERSUS DR. C. R. SWAMY (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 994
(i) The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which the High Court upheld. We directed both parties to file affidavits disclosing their income and...
A. RANJITHKUMAR VERSUS E. KAVITHA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 978
(i) It is evident that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. They have been living separately since 2010, for nearly 15 years....
ASHOK DHANKAD versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 974
(1) The grant of bail constitutes a discretionary judicial remedy that necessitates a delicate and context-sensitive balancing of competing legal and societal interests. On one...
IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs ADHUNIK MEGHALAYA STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 911
(i) It cannot be disputed that entries in Balance Sheets could constitute a valid acknowledgement in view of the categorical pronouncement of the Supreme Court...
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 909
(i) Section 64 of the BNSS, 2023 pertains to how summons shall be served. We are concerned with Section 64(2) of the BNSS, 2023 which...
M.C. RAVIKUMAR VERSUS D.S. VELMURUGAN (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 888
(i) From the bare perusal of the record, it is evident that the second quashing petition raised no such grounds/pleas which were unavailable to the...
HYATT INTERNATIONAL SOUTHWEST ASIA LTD VERSUS ADIT (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 891
(i) Evidently, under DTAAs, the taxing rights of the source State over the business profits of a foreign enterprise are contingent upon the existence of...