PRADEEP BHARDWAJ VERSUS PRIYA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 852
(i) It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court that the institution of marriage is rooted in dignity, mutual respect and shared companionship, and...
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED VERSUS SHREE NIWAS RAMGOPAL (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 832
(i) It is settled in law by virtue of Section 42 of the Partnership Act, 1932 that the partnership will stand dissolved inter alia on...
MAHNOOR FATIMA IMRAN VERSUS M/S VISWESWARA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 646
(i) An instrument of conveyance is compulsorily registrable as required under the Registration Act. Section 23 prescribes four-months’ time for presenting a document for registration...
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) VERSUS ANUPAM GARG (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 808
(i) A reference to GDA v. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65 shows that compensation can take different forms, considering the facts and circumstances at...
GHANSHYAM SONI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 803)
(i) A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by the complainant are that in the year 1999, the Appellant inflicted mental and...
K. Gopi versus The Sub-Registrar (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 462
(i) The registering officer is not concerned with the title held by the executant. He has no adjudicatory power to decide whether the executant has...
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S. V-CON INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD (Supreme Court)
(i) This case does not involve a failure by the assessing officer to conduct an investigation. Instead, according to the Revenue, it is a case...
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...
The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution VERSUS B. Gunashekar (Supreme Court)
Directions regarding reporting and probe of cash transactions in excess of ₹2 Lakh Section 269ST of the Income Tax Act, was introduced to curb black...
Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 483
Framework for distinguishing between works protected under the Copyright Act, 1957, and designs eligible for protection under the Designs Act, 2000 (i) The expression ‘artistic...