SHANTI DEVI VERSUS JAGAN DEVI (SUPREME COURT)
In Kewal Krishnan v. Rajesh Kumar and Others reported in (2022) 18 SCC 489, while looking into whether the defendants had paid any sale consideration...
SHIVAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS VERSUS KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD (SUPREME COURT)
(i) The length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned...
PRADEEP KUMAR KESARWANI VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Supreme Court)
(i) It is by now well settled that summoning any person on the basis of a frivolous or vexatious complaint is something very serious. This...
HYATT INTERNATIONAL SOUTHWEST ASIA LTD VERSUS ADIT (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 891
(i) Evidently, under DTAAs, the taxing rights of the source State over the business profits of a foreign enterprise are contingent upon the existence of...
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE VERSUS RAJ KUMAR ARORA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 498
(i) It cannot be said that the dealing in of “Buprenorphine Hydrochloride” would not amount to an offence under Section 8 of the NDPS Act...
The Correspondence, RBANMS Educational Institution VERSUS B. Gunashekar (Supreme Court)
Directions regarding reporting and probe of cash transactions in excess of ₹2 Lakh Section 269ST of the Income Tax Act, was introduced to curb black...
RAMESH MISHRIMAL JAIN VERSUS AVINASH VISHWANATH PATNE (Supreme Court)
(i) The legal position is very clear that the stamp duty is on the instrument and not on the transaction. Furthermore, it is immaterial, whether...
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR VERSUS SMT. PRABHA JAIN & ORS (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 95
(i) Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act provides that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding“in respect of any matter...
U. SUDHEERA VERSUS C. YASHODA (Supreme Court)
(i) The High Court, without formulating substantial questions of law, cannot grant any interim relief by directing the parties to maintain status quo, till the...
RATHEESHKUMAR @ BABU VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA (SUPREME COURT)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2018 (i) The first important question is whether the appellant-convict at the relevant time was having a reasonable apprehension of death...