SANJAY D. JAIN VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1168
(i) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the FIR dated 06.02.2022 as well as the final report, we are of...
SANJABIJ TARI VERSUS KISHORE S. BORCAR (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 1158)
(i) The Supreme Court framed guidelines for compounding offences under the NI Act nearly fifteen years back in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H.,...
Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul (Supreme Court) 2025 INSC 1133
(i) When the amount mentioned and demanded in the notice sent under Proviso (b) to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to the...
M/S. SHIV STEELS VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1126
(i) The assessments undertaken for the three years were already held to be invalid because of being time barred, in view of Section 19 of...
SHANTI DEVI VERSUS JAGAN DEVI (SUPREME COURT)
In Kewal Krishnan v. Rajesh Kumar and Others reported in (2022) 18 SCC 489, while looking into whether the defendants had paid any sale consideration...
SHIVAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS VERSUS KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD (SUPREME COURT)
(i) The length of the delay is a relevant matter which the court must take into consideration while considering whether the delay should be condoned...
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY VERSUS SEESH RAM SAINI (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 1095
(i) In Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat, (2025) 4 SCC 818 the Supreme Court held that where the allegations pertain to the abuse...
PRADEEP KUMAR KESARWANI VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Supreme Court)
(i) It is by now well settled that summoning any person on the basis of a frivolous or vexatious complaint is something very serious. This...
A. RANJITHKUMAR VERSUS E. KAVITHA (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 978
(i) It is evident that there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties. They have been living separately since 2010, for nearly 15 years....
ASHOK DHANKAD versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (SUPREME COURT) 2025 INSC 974
(1) The grant of bail constitutes a discretionary judicial remedy that necessitates a delicate and context-sensitive balancing of competing legal and societal interests. On one...