SHOBHIT KUMAR MITTAL VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (SUPREME COURT) (2025) 3 SCC 735
(i) A bare perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by complainant/respondent No.2 are vague and omnibus. Other than claiming that the husband...
GHANSHYAM SONI VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) (SUPREME COURT) (2025 INSC 803)
(i) A perusal of the FIR shows that the allegations made by the complainant are that in the year 1999, the Appellant inflicted mental and...